About this Course

Sociology is the study of how human attitudes and behavior are shaped by the social environment and how, vice versa, the social environment emerges from human (inter-)action. The investigation of context effects, where an environmental feature (e.g., a characteristic of a neighborhood or country) affects processes at a lower level (e.g., that of the individual), is therefore central to the discipline. This is also true for the topic of racist and xenophobic attitudes against immigrants, new citizens, and Black and People of Color (BPOC). For example, are native-born white Europeans who are exposed to immigrants or BPOC in their neighborhood or at work less racist and xenophobic, as Contact Theory (Pettigrew 1998) has it, or rather more, as Group Threat Theory (cf., Wimmer 1997) implies?

In recent decades, scholars have increasingly examined such context effects using quantitative statistical methods. However such analyses face serious challenges. That is, single observations are not independent from each other but are (auto-)correlated as siblings, neighbors, classmates, contemporaries, and so on. These complex dependencies among observations make contemporary data sources more sociological and thus exciting than ever before. But they also pose statistical challenges that need to be addressed via multilevel modeling techniques.

In this course, we will discuss sociological theory and research on the contextual sources of racist and xenophobic attitudes, and you will learn how to conduct statistical multilevel analyses testing these theories yourself. In other words, this is an introduction to multilevel analyses, applied to the topic of racism and xenophobia.

Class Attendance

The default for this class is that we meet physically. However, I will try to set up a streaming of our course via Zoom. You will find the link on Absalon.

Intended Learning Objectives

The goals for this course are twofold. First, I hope you will gain a solid understanding of contemporary quantitative research on racist and xenophobic attitudes. Second, I hope you will learn how statistical multilevel modeling works and how to apply these techniques yourself to answer research questions on context effects.

  • Knowledge
    • What are the key theories on the contextual sources of racist and xenophobic attitudes?
    • What are widely-held criticisms of these theories?
    • What are clustered data and which challenges do they pose?
    • What are random intercept and slope models and how do they solve the challenges associated with clustered data?
  • Skills:
    • Students will be able to conduct complex multilevel analyses with Stata or R. This entails, among others:
      • Random intercept models,
      • Random intercept and slope models with cross-level interactions,
      • Degrees of freedom approximation for small cluster samples.
    • Students will be able to apply contemporary theories to pose state-of-the art research questions on context effects, particularly with respect to racist and xenophobic attitudes.
  • Competences:
    • Students will increase their analytic, methodological, logical, and creative-cognitive capacities, that is, their “sociological imagination.”
    • Students will be able to assess (i.e., judge the theoretical and methodological quality of) multilevel analyses (also beyond the specific topic of this class).
    • Students will be able to assess the theoretical soundness of claims about (contextual sources of) racist and xenophobic attitudes.

Tasks

Overall, you have five tasks in this seminar: Thorough preparation of class readings, active participation in the seminar’s discussion, and three assigned portfolios.

Class Readings

This class is based on Snijders and Bosker (2012) as textbook on multilevel modeling. Copies should be available for purchase at the university bookstore. I suggest to buy a copy of the book, so you can work through it carefully.

Apart from this book, we read contemporary empirical studies of racist and xenophobic attitudes. You will find these readings on Absalon. I have selected the readings such that for each session they are an application of those multilevel modeling techniques that we have learned in the previous session. It is thus important that you read these empirical applications closely. On the one hand they illustrate how the abstract techniques can be put to use. On the other hand, they can be considered as a test of whether you have mastered the methodological teachings well enough to understand and parse a typical empirical application.

Syllabus

SessionTopicRequired readingsSkim Reading
1Intro: Racism & XenophobiaClair and Denis (2015), and Hervik (2015)Bonilla-Silva (2015), and ESS ’14 questionnaire
2Recap: (OLS) RegressionGelman and Hill (2007, Ch. 3 & 4)
3Explaining Racist & Xenophobic PrejudiceDinesen and Hjorth (2020), and Pettigrew (1998)
4OLS ReplicationHelbling and Kriesi (2014), and Larsen and Schaeffer (2020)
20 FebSubmit Portfolio 1Racism/Xenophobia and threat in Denmark.
Analyse individual predictors of the Danish ESS 2014 using OLS.
Submit your Portfolio 1 to Peergrade on Absalon until Sunday 23:59 o’clock following Session 4. Afterwards, give your peers feedback on Peergrade until the following Wednesday 12 o’clock.
5Clustered dataSnijders and Bosker (2012, Ch. 2 & 3.1.-3.4)Gelman and Hill (2007, Ch. 11)
6Random InterceptsSnijders and Bosker (2012, Ch. 4)Gelman and Hill (2007, Ch. 11)
7RI Replication 1Schlueter, Masso, and Davidov (2019)
8Visit by Thorkil Klint from Epinion
9RI Replication 2Hiers, Soehl, and Wimmer (2017)
10Work on Portfolio 2
13 MarSubmit Portfolio 2Contextual and individual predictors of Racism/Xenophobia across Europe 1.
Analyse the ESS 2014 using a random intercept model.
Submit your Portfolio 2 to Peergrade on Absalon until Sunday 23:59 o’clock following Session 9. Afterwards, give your peers feedback on Peergrade until the following Wednesday 12 o’clock.
11Random SlopesSnijders and Bosker (2012, Ch. 5), and Heisig and Schaeffer (2019)
12RS ReplicationGreen et al. (2020)
13Statistical inferenceElff et al. (2020)
14Model AssumptionsSnijders and Bosker (2012, Ch. 10)
24 AprSubmit Portfolio 3Contextual and individual predictors of Racism/Xenophobia across Europe 2.
Analyse the ESS 2014 using a random intercept and slope model.
Submit your Portfolio 3 to Peergrade on Absalon until 22 November 23:59 o’clock. Afterwards, give your peers feedback on Peergrade until 29 November 12 o’clock.
7 JunFinal paper submissionBefore 12 o’clock!

References

Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2015. “More Than Prejudice: Restatement, Reflections, and New Directions in Critical Race Theory.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 1(1):73–87. doi: 10.1177/2332649214557042.
Clair, Matthew, and Jeffrey S. Denis. 2015. “Racism, Sociology Of.” Pp. 857–63 in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier.
Dinesen, Peter Thisted, and Frederick Hjorth. 2020. “Attitudes Toward Immigration: Theories, Settings, and Approaches.” in The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Political Science. Oxford University Press.
Elff, Martin, Jan Paul Heisig, Merlin Schaeffer, and Susumu Shikano. 2020. “Multilevel Analysis with Few Clusters: Improving Likelihood-Based Methods to Provide Unbiased Estimates and Accurate Inference.” British Journal of Political Science 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0007123419000097.
Gelman, Andrew, and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchichal Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, Eva G. T., Emilio Paolo Visintin, Oriane Sarrasin, and Miles Hewstone. 2020. “When Integration Policies Shape the Impact of Intergroup Contact on Threat Perceptions: A Multilevel Study Across 20 European Countries.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(3):631–48. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550159.
Heisig, Jan Paul, and Merlin Schaeffer. 2019. “Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction.” European Sociological Review 35(2):258–79. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcy053.
Helbling, Marc, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2014. “Why Citizens Prefer High- Over Low-Skilled Immigrants. Labor Market Competition, Welfare State, and Deservingness.” European Sociological Review 30(5):595–614. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcu061.
Hervik, Peter. 2015. “Xenophobia and Nativism.” Pp. 796–801 in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), edited by J. D. Wright. Oxford: Elsevier.
Hiers, Wesley, Thomas Soehl, and Andreas Wimmer. 2017. “National Trauma and the Fear of Foreigners: How Past Geopolitical Threat Heightens Anti-Immigration Sentiment Today.” Social Forces 96(1):361–88. doi: 10.1093/sf/sox045.
Larsen, Mikkel Haderup, and Merlin Schaeffer. 2020. “Healthcare Chauvinism During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 0(0):1–19. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1860742.
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49(1):65–85.
Schlueter, Elmar, Anu Masso, and Eldad Davidov. 2019. “What Factors Explain Anti-Muslim Prejudice? An Assessment of the Effects of Muslim Population Size, Institutional Characteristics and Immigration-Related Media Claims.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 0(0):1–16. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550160.
Snijders, Tom A. B., and Roel J. Bosker. 2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
Wimmer, Andreas. 1997. “Explaining Xenophobia and Racism: A Critical Review of Current Research Approaches.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 20(1):17–41. doi: 10.1080/01419870.1997.9993946.